Plain Language Summary
Case report highlighting safety and evidence gaps for semaglutide use in a patient with a long-term ileostomy. Gastric emptying effects, altered GI absorption, and fluid/electrolyte risks with semaglutide are potentially amplified in the ileostomy context. Raises clinical awareness about the unique risks of GLP-1 RA use in patients with altered GI anatomy—documenting a patient population excluded from clinical trials where standard safety assumptions may not apply and individualized risk-benefit assessment is required.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), such as semaglutide, dulaglutide, liraglutide, and exenatide, are increasingly used to treat type 2 diabetes and support weight loss. These agents function by enhancing glucose-dependent insulin secretion, suppressing inappropriate glucagon secretion, slowing gastric emptying, and regulating appetite through central nervous system pathways. Since semaglutide's approval in 2017 and U.S. market availability in 2018, its use has expanded significantly. However, there remains limited literature evaluating its safety and efficacy in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy, particularly those with ostomies.
CASE SUMMARY: A 56-year-old Hispanic male with type 2 diabetes, BMI of 54.3, and an ileostomy placed in 2012 was prescribed semaglutide for glycemic control and weight loss by an endocrinology clinic. He continued intermittent use over an 18-month period without complications. Initially, semaglutide was associated with reduced appetite and weight loss of 19 pounds (from 278 lbs., BMI 54.3, to 259 lbs., BMI 50.6) over five months. He paused the medication one week prior to a scheduled colonoscopy and resumed one week after. Within two weeks of restarting, he experienced progressive slowing of gastrointestinal motility, including hard stools and bowel movements every other day. These symptoms culminated in fecal impaction requiring hospitalization later that month. He permanently discontinued semaglutide and has not resumed since.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: To date, no clinical trials or guidelines address the safety of GLP-1 RAs in patients with ileostomies or significant gastrointestinal alterations. This case emphasizes a critical gap in literature. While GLP-1 RAs offer metabolic benefits in type 2 diabetes and weight management, they may pose underrecognized risks in patients with altered bowel anatomy. Until further evidence is available, clinicians should exercise caution, perform individualized risk-benefit assessments, and consider close collaboration with gastroenterology. Further research is needed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of GLP-1 RAs in patients with ostomies.
Authors
Gaytan, Gabriela; Pabon, Andrea; Rosario, Natalie