This narrative review synthesizes evidence identified through targeted searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2010-2025), with a focused selection of human and mechanistic studies examining GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1s), food cue reactivity, prospective cognition, mindfulness-based interventions, and neural network dynamics relevant to 'food noise' and the default mode network (DMN). Food noise is conceptualized here as a form of maladaptive prospection: a faulty way of thinking about the future, characterized by repetitive, cue-driven mental simulation of short-term reward at the expense of long-term goals. Existing neuroimaging and behavioral data suggest that GLP-1s may influence neural systems underlying cue salience and reward anticipation, with several reports indicating reduced food-related intrusive thoughts. Although these findings are preliminary, some mechanistic models posit that GLP-1s could attenuate DMN activity associated with food-related rumination, potentially altering the cognitive context in which eating decisions occur. Patient reports of improved focus, reduced cravings, or greater ease in health-related planning are noted in the literature, but causal links to specific behavioral outcomes remain unestablished. This paper advances a testable hypothesis: reductions in food noise may shift the balance of activity among DMN, salience, and executive networks in ways that support more adaptive forms of prospection. However, current evidence is limited, and the proposed mechanisms and behavioral implications require empirical testing. Further research using direct measures of food noise, longitudinal neuroimaging, and controlled behavioral studies is needed to clarify mechanisms and determine their broader relevance for health and self-regulation.