Randomized double-blind sub-analysis of 61 HIV-positive patients with MASLD evaluating tesamorelin 2 mg/day efficacy and safety specifically among participants on integrase inhibitor (INSTI)-based antiretroviral regimens—the current standard of HIV treatment—measuring visceral fat, hepatic fat fraction, and metabolic parameters. Tests tesamorelin efficacy in the modern ART era. Establishes that tesamorelin is effective and safe in HIV patients on contemporary INSTI-based regimens—filling a critical evidence gap since original phase III trials predated INSTI era treatment and providing confidence for tesamorelin use in patients on modern HIV therapy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Tesamorelin is the only FDA-approved therapy to treat abdominal fat accumulation in people with HIV (PWH). Phase III clinical trials were conducted prior to the introduction of integrase inhibitors (INSTIs), which are now a mainstay of HIV antiretroviral therapy.
DESIGN: We leveraged a randomized double-blind trial of 61 PWH and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tesamorelin 2 mg once daily vs. identical placebo among participants on INSTI-based regimens at baseline.
METHODS: In the parent clinical trial, visceral fat cross-sectional area, hepatic fat fraction, and trunk-to-appendicular fat ratio were quantified using magnetic resonance imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, respectively, at baseline and 12 months. Metabolic and safety outcomes were compared between treatment arms.
RESULTS: Among 38 participants on INSTI-based regimens at baseline, 15 individuals on tesamorelin and 16 individuals on placebo completed the 12-month study. Tesamorelin led to significant declines in visceral fat (median [interquartile range]: -25 [-93, -2] vs. 14 [3, 41] cm 2 , P = 0.001), hepatic fat (-4.2% [-12.3%, -2.7%] vs. -0.5% [-3.9%, 2.7%], P = 0.01), and trunk-to-appendicular fat ratio (-0.1 [-0.3, 0.0] vs. 0.0 [-0.1, 0.1], P = 0.03). Tesamorelin was well tolerated with a similar frequency of adverse events, including hyperglycemia, between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis provides the first dedicated data on the efficacy and safety of tesamorelin among PWH on INSTI-based regimens. Despite the association of INSTI use with weight gain and adipose tissue dysfunction, tesamorelin had beneficial effects on body composition with no exacerbation of glycemic control.
Authors
Russo, Samuel C; Ockene, Mollie W; Arpante, Allison K; Johnson, Julia E; Lee, Hang; Toribio, Mabel; Stanley, Takara L; Hadigan, Colleen M; Grinspoon, Steven K; Erlandson, Kristine M; Fourman, Lindsay T