PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and potential efficacy of topical elamipretide in patients affected with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON).
DESIGN: This phase II, prospective, randomized, vehicle-controlled, single-center clinical trial involved administration of elamipretide 1% topical ophthalmic solution to patients with LHON over a 52-week double-masked treatment period, followed by an open-label extension (OLE) for up to 108 additional weeks of treatment.
PARTICIPANTS: Twelve patients with LHON were included in this study. Patients aged 18 to 50 years with decreased vision for at least ≥ 1 year and ≤ 10 years, and a genetically confirmed diagnosis of m.11778G>A LHON were eligible for this trial.
METHODS: For the first 52 weeks of the study, patients were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: elamipretide in both eyes or elamipretide in 1 eye (left eye and right eye were considered separate groups) and vehicle in the other eye, followed by an OLE in which both eyes were treated with elamipretide.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was assessment of adverse events (AEs) from the administration of topical elamipretide, and the primary efficacy end point was change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary outcome measures included changes in color vision, visual field mean deviation, and electrophysiological outcomes.
RESULTS: Elamipretide was well tolerated with the majority of AEs being mild to moderate and resolving spontaneously. The change from baseline in BCVA in elamipretide-treated eyes was not significantly different from the vehicle eyes at any time point. Six of 12 subjects met the criteria for clinically relevant benefit (CRB). In the post hoc analysis, change from baseline in mean deviation in the central visual field was significantly greater in elamipretide-treated eyes versus the vehicle eyes. Compared with baseline, both treatment groups showed improvement in color discrimination and contrast sensitivity in the OLE.
CONCLUSIONS: Elamipretide treatment was generally well tolerated, with no serious AEs reported. Although this study did not meet its primary BCVA efficacy end point, improvements across assessments on visual function during the OLE and the post hoc findings of the Humphrey automated visual field central region were encouraging and require further exploration.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.